Documentary Movie Reviews
(For optimum viewing, adjust the zoom level of your browser to 125%.)
Aka Charlie Sheen (2025)
Rate:
6
Viewed:
10/25
10/25:
Aka Charlie Sheen is mostly a waste of time.
Out of three long hours, about ten minutes is filled with useful facts. The rest is talk, druggie stories,
and lots of pointless video clips from the past. No depth is ever achieved. Conspicuously absent is Charlie
Sheen's long, long history of violence against women which goes back to the 80's. In one author's book, he
called him "Sperminator."
All of the stuff that went on during the last thirty years for Charlie Sheen, I failed to pay attention.
"Winning"? Ha! It's more like, "Wasting." He completely fell off the map after 1994 by doing no notable films
in the leading man role. Being shown some clips of Two and a Half Men, a TV sitcom I've never watched in
my life, it's low-quality crap with zero comedy.
When I saw Charlie Sheen's face in the documentary, he's almost unrecognizable with a fried brain. I was
even more shocked by Denise Richards' appearance given that she's currently 54. The woman is so ugly that all of
the plastic surgeries have done a number on her face. Brooke Mueller's face (who???) is half-paralyzed
with her nose almost gone. If there's anyone I want to laugh at, it's Sean Penn as the pseudo-poet. What
a fucking joke he is.
Anyway, a few things I didn't expect to hear are Charlie Sheen addressing the long-standing accusations that he
raped Corey Haim during the filming of Lucas, confessing to be diagnosed as
HIV-positive, and admitting to having sex with men. The first part, I don't feel he did it. Also, Corey
Feldman's credibility is 100% shot, and he's a proven liar. It's more likely Dominick Brascia of
Friday the 13th Part V: A New Beginning or another guy who did.
All in all, if there's anybody who can provide the answers that will instantly explain everything about
Charlie Sheen's downfall, it's Martin Sheen and Emilio Estevez, but they refused to participate in
Aka Charlie Sheen.